Contracts, Policies and Processes – The slips, trips and falls of employment
Case Analysis: Elisha v Vision Australia Limited [2024] HCA 50
Employers continue to face difficulties when employment matters are escalated to courts and tribunals, often due to unclear employment policies and procedural errors that form part of the employment contract. This case involving Vision Australia brings a number of employment related lessons to the forefront.
Overview
On December 11, 2024, the High Court of Australia delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Elisha v Vision Australia Limited [2024] HCA 50. This case has significant implications for employment, particularly concerning the availability of damages for psychiatric injury resulting from the way in which an employee is dismissed.
Case Background
Mr. Adam Elisha was employed by Vision Australia Limited as an adaptive technology consultant since September 2006. In March 2015, during a work-related trip, Mr. Elisha was involved in an incident which led to allegations of aggressive behaviour at a hotel. These allegations were reported to his manager, who referenced previous unsubstantiated and undocumented claims of similar behaviour.
On 19 May 2015, Mr. Elisha received a “stand down letter” requiring his attendance at a disciplinary meeting. The letter cited misconduct during the Hotel incident, but did not include prior allegations.
Despite Mr. Elisha denying the allegations, Vision Australia decided to terminate his employment on 29 May 2015, based on the Hotel incident and previous unsubstantiated claims.
Subsequently, Mr. Elisha was diagnosed with a major depressive disorder.
Legal Proceedings
Mr. Elisha initiated legal action in August 2020, claiming damages for psychiatric injury due to:
- Breach of Contract: Vision Australia failed to adhere to its disciplinary procedures, which were incorporated into Mr. Elisha’s employment contract.
- Negligence: Vision Australia failed to provide a safe system of investigation and decision-making.
The primary judge ruled in favor of Mr. Elisha on the breach of contract claim, awarding damages for psychiatric injury, but dismissed the negligence claim. The Court of Appeal overturned this decision, stating that psychiatric injury damages were too remote and not recoverable for breach of contract.
High Court Judgment
The High Court upheld the primary judge’s decision, emphasising that:
- Vision Australia’s disciplinary procedures were part of Mr. Elisha’s employment contract.
- The breach of these procedures, particularly the lack of procedural fairness, directly caused Mr. Elisha’s psychiatric injury.
- Psychiatric harm was a foreseeable consequence of a flawed dismissal process, making the injury not too remote.
The High Court did not find it necessary to address the negligence claim, given the success of the contractual claim.
Key Lessons for Employers
The Elisha v Vision Australia Limited case provides several critical lessons for employers:
- Adherence to Disciplinary Procedures: Employers must strictly follow their own disciplinary procedures, especially those incorporated into employment contracts. Failure to do so can result in significant legal and financial consequences.
- Procedural Fairness: Ensuring procedural fairness during disciplinary processes is crucial. Employees must be informed of all allegations against them and given a fair opportunity to respond to all of those allegations.
- Foreseeability of Psychiatric Harm: Employers should recognise that psychiatric harm can be a foreseeable consequence of mishandled disciplinary actions and issues. Elisha v Vision Australia Limited underscores the importance of handling dismissals with care to avoid causing undue stress and injury to employees.
- Documentation and Communication: Proper documentation and clear communication throughout the disciplinary process are essential. Employers should maintain detailed records of all steps taken and ensure transparency with the employee involved at all times.
- Legal Compliance: Regularly review and update employment contracts and disciplinary procedures to ensure compliance with current laws and best practices. Seek advice when necessary to navigate complex employment issues.
Conclusion
The High Court’s decision in Elisha v Vision Australia Limited sets a precedent for the treatment of psychiatric injury claims arising from employment disputes.
Employers should take heed of this ruling and implement robust, fair, and transparent disciplinary processes to mitigate risks and uphold their duty of care to employees. Further to this, employers should ensure that any procedure that they put in place is followed.
Connect with us
If you’d like to learn more or have any questions, please contact us here and one of our Workplace Strategists will be in touch within 24 hours.